President's IQP Awards
ENTRY RULES AND GUIDELINES1. A project may be submitted any time after its completion.
Completion is defined as follows: If the Registrar has recorded the Completion of Degree Requirement form (CDR), the project is completed for those students named on the forms.2. A project may be submitted only once.
3. To enter the competition, the project author(s) must:
- Fill out the competition entry form online
- Submit a separate Executive Summary (file size 16MB max) including the title of the project and the names of the students. The executive summary should be no more than five single-spaced pages in 12pt font. Note: You may revise the executive summary submitted with your final project report for this purpose. This summary should accurately represent the report and call attention to those features of the project which are felt to be outstanding and worthy of consideration by the Awards Committee. This summary is a major factor in the preliminary appraisal stage. Projects are unlikely to get beyond the preliminaries if the summary is poorly written. We urge you to discuss your Executive Summary with your advisor.
- Project report. Normally, electronic copies of the project are available in the Gordon Library’s database. A link to the report should be provided on the entry form. If the report is not available through the library please consult with the IGSD regarding access to the report.
- Notify your IQP advisor(s) that you will be entering your project in the competition.
4. Project advisors will be asked to comment, in writing, on the project for the Awards Committee. A positive recommendation from the advisor(s) is required before a project will move beyond the preliminary stage to the finalist stage.
COMPETITION GUIDELINESProjects will be judged and awards made once each academic year.
1. The awards will be made for the first, second, and the third places at the discretion of the judges.
2. Projects will be judged using the following system:
Preliminary review of all entries.
The Interdisciplinary and Global Studies Division (IGSD) will appoint a faculty screening panel to read and review the project executive summaries and reports. This committee will select the best five or six projects as finalists.
The Final judging
The Awards Committee, which includes external judges, will read the summaries and review the project reports of the finalists.
In Term C, the authors of the selected projects will be invited to make a 20 minute presentation of their project during the final judging.
The competition winners will be announced by the judges at a reception following the oral presentations.
The competition presentation this year will be on Friday, January 27, 2017 in the Rubin Campus Center Odeum.